At the end of this course, the students; 1) develop deep understanding of key concepts and debates about adaptation within the interface of art, media and economy politics. 2) have a comprehensive knowledge on different epistemological and methodological positions towards adaptation 3) ) have an enhance ability to construct a solid grounding of conceptual and theoretical language within various contexts of adaptation and to evaluate them on a case-by-case basis. 4) to analyze and synthesize the interplay of different of adaptation contexts and genres in relation to both reproduction and reception of adaptation.
MODE OF DELIVERY
Face to face
PRE-REQUISITES OF THE COURSE
No
RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL PROGRAMME COMPONENT
No
COURSE DEFINITION
At the end of this course, the students develop a profound understanding about the basic concepts and discussions regarding adaptation and the artistic, media and political economic interface of adaptation. They have the opportunity to gain a comprehensive knowledge about the ontological, epistemological and methodological approaches of adaptation. They gain the skill to evaluate the conceptual and theoretical production of language in different adaptation texts.
COURSE CONTENTS
WEEK
TOPICS
1st Week
Definition of adaptation in various disciplines
2nd Week
Adaptation: context and convention
3rd Week
Why Adaptation?
4th Week
Adaptation: Theory and Practice
5th Week
Adaptation and semiotics: form of content, form of expression, substance of content, and substance of expression
Adaptation from theatre to cinema and TV and vice versa
11th Week
Adaptation and music Adaptation from plastic arts vice versa
12th Week
Adaptation and video games and comic and animation
13th Week
Transcultural Adaptation, adaptation as cultural production
14th Week
Alternative adaptation strategies and categories and genres
RECOMENDED OR REQUIRED READING
BAKHTIN, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World (Çev. Helene Iswolsky). USA: Indiana University Press. BAKHTIN M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination, Four Essays (Edited by Michael Holquist, Trans. By Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist) Austin: University of Texas Press. CONNOR, J. 2007. ?The Persistence of Fidelity: Adaptation Theory Today?, M/C Journal, May 10(2). Retrieved 11 November 2016 from . HUTCHEON, Linda. 2006. A Theory of Adaptation. New York: Routledge. HUTCHEON, L. 2007. ?In Defence of Literary Adaptation as Cultural Production?, M/C Journal, May 10(2). Retrieved 11 November 2016 from . LEITCH, Thomas. 2007. Film Adaptation and Its Discontents: From Gone with the Wind to The Passion of the Christ. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. LEITCH, Thomas. 2008. ?Adaptation Studies at a Crossroads,.?, Adaptation 1(1): 63-77. MURRAY, Simone. 2012. The Adaptation Industry: The Cultural Economy of Contemporary Literary Adaptation. New York: Routledge. SANDERS, Julie. 2006. Adaptation and Appropriation. London: Routledge STAM Robert and Alessandra RAENGO. 2008. Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation USA: Blackwell Publishing
PLANNED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING METHODS
Lecture,Discussion,Questions/Answers
ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA
Quantity
Percentage(%)
Mid-term
1
20
Assignment
1
40
Total(%)
60
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%)
60
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%)
40
Total(%)
100
LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION
Turkish
WORK PLACEMENT(S)
No
KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES (KLO) / MATRIX OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO)