TYPE OF COURSE UNIT	Elective Course
LEVEL OF COURSE UNIT	Doctorate Of Science
YEAR OF STUDY	-
SEMESTER	-
NUMBER OF ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED	10
NAME OF LECTURER(S)	-
LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE COURSE UNIT	At the end of this course, the students; 1) Learn the Classification of Curriculum Focus, Basic Learning, Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes. 2) Mathematical Process Skills and Nature of Mathematics 3) Give examples of the Design and Construction of the Curriculum Program. 4) Explain the systems of comparison of the Mathematics Curriculum Program with Other Programs.
MODE OF DELIVERY	Face to face
PRE-REQUISITES OF THE COURSE	No
RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL PROGRAMME COMPONENT	None
COURSE DEFINITION	Conceptual framework for 5-8 Mathematics; Mathematical Processes Skill; Natures of Mathematics; Contexts for Learning and Teaching; Inquire-Based Learning and Project based Learning; Assessment and Evaluation; Structure and Design of the Curriculum Guide; Comparing the Mathematics Curriculum Program with the Others.
COURSE CONTENTS	WEEK TOPICS 1st Week Curriculum Focus 2nd Week Classification of Basic Learning, Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes 3rd Week Linking Curriculum with Other Learning Areas 4th Week Linking Curriculum with Other Learning Areas 5th Week Conceptual Structure of Class Mathematics 6th Week Mathematical Process Skills 7th Week The Nature of Mathematics 8th Week Learning and Teaching Contents 9th Week Inquiry Learning and Project Based Learning 10th Week Inquiry Learning and Project Based Learning 11th Week Assessment and evaluation 12th Week Design and Structure of Curriculum Programs 13th Week Comparison of Mathematics Curriculum with Other Programs 14th Week Comparison of Mathematics Curriculum with Other Programs 15th Week
RECOMENDED OR REQUIRED READING	1) Böke, C.H. (2002). Primary mathematics programs in Turkey and the UK Comparison. Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences. Unpublished High License thesis. 2) California Common Core State Standards; Mathematics (2013). "Common Core State Standards Initiative". (CCSS). 2013. [Online]: Http://www.corestandards.org/ 3) Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (CCSSM) (2010). [Online]: Http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf 4) Shepherd, A. (2011). England and Turkey in the United States primary education Comparison of mathematics programs, Celal Bayar University, Social Sciences Institute, Unpublished Master Thesis. 5) Demirel, Ö. (2000). Comparative Education, Ankara: Pegem Publications. 6) Emotion, N. (2013). Examination of primary education mathematics curriculum: An international difference, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Unpublished Master Thesis. 7) Eurybase Information Database Training System Training Systems in Europe System in England. Web: http: //eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/eurybase/eurybase_full_reports/ UN_EN.pdf 8) INCA Summary Profile - Education in England (2006, Tem 10). International Review Curriculum and Assessment Frameworks (INCA). Web: http://www.inca.org.uk/englandsystem- Mainstream.html 9) Kaytan, E. (2007). Turkey, Singapore and England Primary Mathematics Teaching Hacettepe University Social Sciences Institute, Unpublished Master Thesis. 10) Mathematics: National Curriculum for England: Basic Stages 1-4 (1999). Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Web: http://www.nc.uk.net Primary Mathematics Curriculum. (2007). Curriculum Planning and Development Department Ministry of Education. Singapore. 11) Ministry of National Education (2013). Middle School Mathematics Teaching Program. Ministry of Education Board of Education Presidency.25 12) Ministry of National Education (2009). Mathematics 6-8. Classroom Curriculum. Ministry of Education Board of Education Presidency 13) Ministry of Education, Ministry of Education (MOE), (2012). Education in Singapore. [Online]: Http://www.moe.gov.sg/about/files/moe-corporate-brochure.pdf Nebraska Mathematics Standards (2010). Www.education.ne.gov. 14) Özkan, A.E. (2006). Turkey, Belgium (Flemish) and Singapore Mathematics Teaching A Comparative Study on the. Master Thesis. Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara. 15) Singapore Inspection and Evaluation Board. (2007). Web: http: //www.seab.gov.sg Http://www.homestaysingapore.com/en/study_singapore/education_system.htm 16) Review and Evaluation Report of New Teaching Programs (2005). Http://www.erg.sabanciuniv.edu/
PLANNED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING METHODS	Lecture,Practice,Other
ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA	Quantity Percentage(%) Total(%) 0 Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%) 0 Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%) 100 Total(%) 100
ECTS WORKLOAD	Activities Number Hours Workload Midterm exam Preparation for Quiz Individual or group work 14 10 140 Preparation for Final exam Course hours 14 3 42 Preparation for Midterm exam Laboratory (including preparation) Final exam Homework 2 20 40 Term Project Research 1 60 60 Weekly Articles and Resource Research 10 2 20 Total Workload 302 Total Workload / 30 10,06 ECTS Credits of the Course 10
LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION	Turkish
WORK PLACEMENT(S)	No