Home  »  Institute of Educational Sciences »  Master's of Education Administration with Thesis

COURSE UNIT TITLECOURSE UNIT CODESEMESTERTHEORY + PRACTICE (Hour)ECTS
SUPERVISION AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN EDUCATION EYD697 Second Term (Spring) 3 + 0 7

TYPE OF COURSE UNITCompulsory Course
LEVEL OF COURSE UNITMaster's Degree With Thesis
YEAR OF STUDY1
SEMESTERSecond Term (Spring)
NUMBER OF ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED7
NAME OF LECTURER(S)Professor Burhanettin Dönmez
LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE COURSE UNIT At the end of this course, the students;
1) Will be able to explain the relationship between educational supervision and educational administration.
2) Will be able to explain the concepts related to educational supervision and accountability.
3) Knows the historical development of educational supervision.
4) Knows the features of modern educational supervision.
5) Knows the competencies of the supervisors.
6) Will be able to explain and interpret the problems of the education system related to supervision.
7) Interpret different audit approaches.
8) Evaluate new approaches related to auditing.
9) Can prepare a research proposal about educational supervision and accountability.
MODE OF DELIVERYFace to face
PRE-REQUISITES OF THE COURSENo
RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL PROGRAMME COMPONENTNo
COURSE DEFINITIONThe aim of this course is to draw attention to the increasing importance and complexity of accountability in education at the theoretical and practical levels, to outline the main questions and problems related to accountability, and to develop discussion processes on the conditions and difficulties of operating accountability in education.
COURSE CONTENTS
WEEKTOPICS
1st Week Introduction of the course and acquaintance
2nd Week The concept of educational supervision and its development in the historical process
3rd Week Principles of contemporary auditing.
4th Week Competencies and roles of the educational supervisor.
5th Week Audit approaches
6th Week Audit approaches
7th Week Training and development of training employees in supervision
8th Week Midterm exam
9th Week Accountability and other related concepts
10th Week Types and classification of accountability
11th Week Accountability in education and its concept and types
12th Week The system of measurement, evaluation and accountability in Education creation
13th Week Accountability policies at school
14th Week Evaluation of audit and accountability projects
RECOMENDED OR REQUIRED READINGAccountability in Educational Organizations. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI) Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2017: 39-68
Acheson, Keith A. , Meredith Damien Gall. (1987). Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers. New York: Longman.
Angelo, Th omas A. , K. Patricia Cross (1993). Classroom Assesment Techniques: A Handbook of Colle ge Teachers. Jossey-Bass, New York.
Aydın, İnayet. (2014). Öğretimde Denetim. Ankara: PEGEM-A Yayınları.

Aydın, Mustafa. (2014). Çağdaş Eğitim Denetimi. İstanbul: Gazi Kitabevi.
Balcı, Asım (2008), ?Kamu Yönetiminde Hesap Verebilirlik Anlayışı?, A.Balcı, A.Nohutçu, N.K.Öztürk, B.Coşkun, (Ed.), Kamu Yönetiminde Çağdaş, Yaklaşımlar, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara.
Başar, Hüseyin. (1993). Eğitim Denetçisi. Ankara: PEGEM Yayınları.
Beycioğlu, K. ve Dönmez, B. (2009).Eğitim Denetimini Yeniden Düşünmek. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 10 (2) 71-93
Bülbül, M. Acar, M. Özdemir, S. (2018) Eğitimde Hesap Verebilirlik. PEGEM-A Yayınları
Cogan, Morris, L. (1973). Clinical Supervision. Houghton Miffl in Comp. Boston.
Erdağ, C. & Karadağ, E. (2017). Okul Hesap Verebilirliği Modelleri: Bütüncül Bir Çözümleme. İş Ahlakı Dergisi. 10, 303?341.
Glickman , D. Carl. (2002). Leadership for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curricullum Development (ASCD), USA.
Glickman D. C. , S.P.Gordon, J.M. Ross-Gordon. (2004). Supervision and Instructional Leadership. Pearson Education Inc. USA.
Glanz, J. & Neville, R. (Eds). (1996). Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues, and Controversies. Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
Gündüz,Y., Göker, S.D. (2017). Eğitim Denetimi Sürecinde Hesap Verebilirlik ve Şeffaflık Uygulamaları. OMÜ Eğtim Fakültesi Dergisi. 36(1), 83-93
Himmetoğlu,B., Ayduğ, D., Bayrak, C. (2017). Opinions of School Administrators about
Oliva, P. & PawLas, G. (2004). Supervision for today?s schools. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Öztürk, N. K., ve Coşkun B. (Der.) Kamu Yönetiminde Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar, Ankara, Seçkin Yayınevi.
Pajak, Edward. (1993). Approaches To Clinical Supervision: Alternatives for Improving Instruction. Christopher-Gordon Publisher Inc. Norwood, MA.
Samsun, N. (2003). Hesap Verebilirlik ve İyi Yönetişim? İyi Yönetişimin Temel Unsurları, Ankara, Maliye Bakanlığı Yayını.
Taner, A.,(2015). Demokrasi, hesap verme sorumluluğu ve hükümet modelleri. Uludağ Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 1, 71-92
Taymaz, Haydar (2013). Teftiş. Ankara: PEGEM-A Yayınları.
PLANNED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING METHODSLecture,Discussion,Questions/Answers,Problem Solving,Report Preparation,Presentation
ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA
 QuantityPercentage(%)
Mid-term140
Total(%)40
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%)40
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%)60
Total(%)100
ECTS WORKLOAD
Activities Number Hours Workload
Midterm exam122
Preparation for Quiz
Individual or group work14570
Preparation for Final exam
Course hours14228
Preparation for Midterm exam7749
Laboratory (including preparation)
Final exam7749
Homework
Total Workload198
Total Workload / 306,6
ECTS Credits of the Course7
LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTIONTurkish
WORK PLACEMENT(S)No
  

KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES (KLO) / MATRIX OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO)
LO1LO2LO3LO4LO5LO6LO7LO8LO9
K1                 
K2                 
K3                 
K4                 
K5                 
K6                 
K7                 
K8                 
K9                 
K10                 
K11                 
K12                 
K13                 
K14                 
K15                 
K16