At the end of this course, the students; 1) have knowledge about historical development of Turkish education. 2) comprehend the importance of Turkish education in historical periods. 3) nalyse the past and current situation of Turkish education.
MODE OF DELIVERY
PRE-REQUISITES OF THE COURSE
No
RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL PROGRAMME COMPONENT
COURSE DEFINITION
Language families, Altaic language theory, the place of of Turkish in the classification of world languages; historical periods and sources of Turkish language; teaching Turkish in the historical process; findings related to teaching Turkish in historical provenances of Turkic
COURSE CONTENTS
WEEK
TOPICS
1st Week
1st Week Structure of Turkish and place among World languages
2nd Week
2nd Week Historical periods of Turkish
3rd Week
3rd Week Historical periods of Turkish
4th Week
4th Week Historical periods of Turkish
5th Week
5th Week Teaching Turkish in old Turkic era
6th Week
6th Week Teaching Turkish in old Turkic era
7th Week
7th Week Teaching Turkish in old Turkic era
8th Week
8th Week Mid-term
9th Week
9th Week Teaching Turkish in middle Turkic era
10th Week
10th Week Teaching Turkish in middle Turkic era
11th Week
11th Week Teaching Turkish in middle Turkic era
12th Week
12th Week Teaching Turkish in new Turkic era
13th Week
13th Week Teaching Turkish in new Turkic era
14th Week
14th Week Teaching Turkish in new Turkic era
15th Week
RECOMENDED OR REQUIRED READING
Ata, A. (2010). Orhun ve Uygur Türkçesi. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
Atalay, B. (1992). Divanü lugat-it Türk tercümesi I. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları
Akyüz, Y. (2008). Türk eğitim tarihi m.ö.1000-m.s. 2008. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
Bayraktar, N. (2005). Yabancılara Türkçe öğretiminin tarihsel gelişimi. Aralık 15, 2010 tarihinde http://turkoloji.cu.edu.tr/ adresinden alınmıştır.
Counsil For Cultural Comission.(2001) Common european framework of reference for language, learning, teaching, assesment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dietrich, A. (2006). Amerikan üniversitelerinde Türkçe öğretim. Yazınsal Türler Uluslararası Sempozyumu. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
Ercilasun, A. B. (2005). Başlangıçtan yirminci yüzyıla Türk dili tarihi. Ankara: Akçağ Yayıncılık.
Göğüş, B. (1970). Ana dili olarak Türkçenin öğretimine tarihsel bir bakış. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten, 123-154.
Güzel, A. (2011). Sempozyum Açılış Töreni Protokol Konuşmaları. III. Uluslararası Dünya Dili Türkçe Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı (s. xxxii-xxxiv). İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
Hengirmen, M. (1993-c). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretimi. A.Ü. TÖMER Dil Dergisi, 10, 5-9.
MEB (2009). Diller için Avrupa ortak başvuru metni öğrenme-öğretme-değerlendirme. Ankara: MEB Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
Özönder, S. (1996). Ali Şir Nevayi Muhakemetü'l lugateyn. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
PLANNED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING METHODS
Lecture,Discussion,Project,Presentation
ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA
Mid-term 1 30
Assignment
Presentation of Article 1 10
Total(%)
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%)
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%) 1 60
Total(%) 100
ECTS WORKLOAD
Activities
Number
Hours
Workload
Midterm exam
1
3
3
Preparation for Quiz
Individual or group work
Preparation for Final exam
1
30
30
Course hours
12
2
24
Preparation for Midterm exam
1
20
20
Laboratory (including preparation)
Final exam
1
3
3
Homework
1
25
25
Total Workload
105
Total Workload / 30
3,5
ECTS Credits of the Course
4
LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION
WORK PLACEMENT(S)
No
KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES (KLO) / MATRIX OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO)