At the end of this course, the students; 1) Can discuss the Turkish course curriculum in the context of teacher qualifications 2) Explains the basic concepts of programs and program design. 3) Can determine target behaviors appropriate to the course and student level 4) Can analyze the measurement tool taking into account the objectives. 5) Can compare Turkish course curriculum in historical process
MODE OF DELIVERY
Face to face
PRE-REQUISITES OF THE COURSE
No
RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL PROGRAMME COMPONENT
TEAD108 Basic Concepts of Language Education
TEAD203 Approaches of Turkish Teaching and Learning
COURSE DEFINITION
COURSE CONTENTS
WEEK
TOPICS
1st Week
Basic concepts about curriculum
2nd Week
References to lesson planning in General Teacher competencies, Turkish Language Teaching Teacher competencies.
3rd Week
Preparation and evaluation process of teaching programs
Draft Turkish Program 1 (One class) (Student work)
16th Week
17th Week
Annual and daily plan preparation processes, examples
18th Week
19th Week
Annual plan preparation application
20th Week
21th Week
Daily Plan preparation application
22th Week
23th Week
general evaluation
24th Week
RECOMENDED OR REQUIRED READING
Compulsory Sources:
Akçay, A. & Kardaş, M. N. (Edt. )(2019). Türkçe dersi öğretim programları. Ankara: Pegem. T. C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx
Suggested Sourches (1) Zeynep DEMİRTAŞ, Eğitimde Program Değerlendirme Yaklaşımlarına Genel Bir Bakış* University Journal of Education, 7(4-özel sayı), 756-768. (2) Şimşek, Nil Didem(2021) ?Türkçe Öğretim Programları?, Türkçe Öğretimine Genel Bir Bakış,(Ed: Fahri Temizyürek-Tuncay Türkben), Pegem Akademi (3) Yıldırım, Çiğdem(2021) Türkçe Öğrenme ve Öğretim Yaklaşımları Türkçe Öğretimine Genel Bir Bakış,(Ed: Fahri Temizyürek-Tuncay Türkben), Pegem Akademi, s.357-380 (4) MEB, Öğretim Programları Değerlendirme Raporu(2020),179-188
(5) Temizyürek, F. & Balcı, A. (2006). Cumhuriyet Dönemi İlköğretim Okulları Türkçe Programları (1923-2004). Ankara: Nobel.
(6) Hümeyra KUTLUBAY (2015), 1928?den Günümüze Kadar Türkçe Öğretim Programlarında Dil Bilgisi Öğretiminin Durumu, YL tezi
(7) Göğüş, Beşir ?Anadili Olarak Türkçenin Öğretimine Tarihsel Bir Bakış?
Recommended Soruces:
Özbay, M. (2006). Türkçe Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri I. Ankara: Öncü. Temizyürek, F. & Balcı, A. (2006). Cumhuriyet Dönemi İlköğretim Okulları Türkçe Programları (1923-2004). Ankara: Nobel. Uçgun D. (2006). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Türkçe Öğretmenlerinin Yetiştirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
PLANNED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING METHODS
Lecture,Discussion,Questions/Answers,Presentation
ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA
Quantity
Percentage(%)
Mid-term
1
35
Practice
2
30
Total(%)
65
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%)
65
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%)
35
Total(%)
100
ECTS WORKLOAD
Activities
Number
Hours
Workload
Midterm exam
1
2
2
Preparation for Quiz
1
10
10
Individual or group work
12
3
36
Preparation for Final exam
1
8
8
Course hours
12
2
24
Preparation for Midterm exam
0
0
0
Laboratory (including preparation)
0
0
0
Final exam
1
2
2
Homework
0
0
0
Presentation (including preperation)
1
10
10
Total Workload
92
Total Workload / 30
3,06
ECTS Credits of the Course
3
LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION
Turkish
WORK PLACEMENT(S)
No
KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES (KLO) / MATRIX OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO)