At the end of this course, the students; 1) learns that humour is not humiliation or teasing 2) recognizes that humour means an act of thinking, 3) learns that humour is the most effective communication tool if it is preferred and the cultural infrastructure is appropriate,
MODE OF DELIVERY
Face to face
PRE-REQUISITES OF THE COURSE
No
RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL PROGRAMME COMPONENT
None.
COURSE DEFINITION
Theoretic studies about humour; unveiling literature about humour; humour- funny- (wag) relationship; the relationship between philosophy, literature, politics, pyschology and humour; the reflections of social structure features to humour; different usage forms of humour and templets chosen from varied channels of media will be discussed.
COURSE CONTENTS
WEEK
TOPICS
1st Week
General Knowledge About The Course
2nd Week
Humour and Phylosophy : Analysis of chosen texts
3rd Week
Humour and Phylosophy : Analysis of chosen texts
4th Week
Humour and Phsycology : Analysis of chosen texts
5th Week
Humour and Phsycology : Analysis of chosen texts
6th Week
Humour and Sociology : Analysis of chosen texts
7th Week
Humour and Sociology : Analysis of chosen texts
8th Week
Mid-Term
9th Week
Humour and Literature : Analysis of chosen texts
10th Week
Cinema and Humour: Analysis about national examples
11th Week
Cinema and Humour: Analysis about national examples
12th Week
Cinema and Humour: Analysis about international examples
13th Week
Cinema and Humour: Analysis about international examples
14th Week
General evaluations about term.
RECOMENDED OR REQUIRED READING
Aamodt, S. ,Wang, S. (2011). Beyninize Hoş Geldiniz (B.Erkan,Çev.). İstanbul: NTV (2. Baskı ). Aydoğan, A. (2015). Düşüncenin Çağrısı : Kant ,Schopenhauer, Heidegger. İstanbul : Say yayınları (4. Baskı). Bergson, H.(2013). Gülme ( T.Güner , Çev.).İstanbul : Mitra. Duran, R.(2002). PiereBourdieu: Sosyolog Bir Militan.Cogito, 31 , 327. Erentay, S. (2012). Mizahi Mizaç Her Derde İlaç. Psikeart, 22, 36?38. Feneglio,I.,Georgeon, F. (2007).Doğu'da Mizah. (A.Berktay, Çev.). İstanbul :YKY(2.Baskı). Frankl, V.E., (2012). İnsanın Anlam Arayışı. (S.Budak,Çev.). İstanbul: Okuyan (6.Baskı). Güleç, C. , (2012). Anadolu?dan Yükselen Humanist Kahkaha.Psikeart, 22, 47. Heller, A., (2006). Bir Ahlak Kuramı. (A.Yılmaz,K.Tütüncü&E.Demirel,Çev.)İstanbul: Ayrıntı. Isıyel, T., (2012). Kahkaha Kimden Yana; Psikeart, 22, 123. Scott, J.C., (1995). Tahakküm ve Direniş Sanatları Gizli Senaryolar.(A.Türker, Çev.).İstanbul : Ayrıntı. Kara, H., (2014). Yöneticilerin Mizah Tarzlarının Uygulamadaki Durumunun Kuramsal ve Uygulamalı Olarak Açıklanması. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, XVII, 705. Kierkegaard, S., (2013) Kahkaha Benden Yana. (N.Çatlı, Çev.). İstanbul : Ayrıntı (3.Baskı). Önder, E., (2012 ) Mizah.Psikeart, 22, 5. Öz, F. &Hiçdurmaz, D., (2010). Stresle Başetmede Önemli Bir Yol: Mizahın Kullanımı.Anadolu Hemşirelik Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 13: 1, 85. Saydam, M.B., (2012). Bir Muzip GnostikMutasavvıf Nasreddin. Psikeart , 22,41-45. Sutherland, S., (2009). İrrasyonel.( G.EKİNCİ,Çev.). İstanbul : Domingo. Şahin, A.R.,(2012).Mizah Duygusu. Psikeart, 22,11. Üstündağ , M., (2010). Denemeyenler. İstanbul : Sel.(2.Baskı). Yazgan,Y., (2012). Güleriz Ağlanacak Halimize. Psikeart, 22 , 35. Kutlu, P., (1972, 30 Eylül). Oğuz Atay?la Ropörtaj. Yeni Ortam Gazetesi
PLANNED LEARNING ACTIVITIES AND TEACHING METHODS
Questions/Answers,Discussion,Lecture
ASSESSMENT METHODS AND CRITERIA
Quantity
Percentage(%)
Mid-term
1
30
Assignment
1
10
Attendance
1
25
Presentation of Case Study
1
25
Total(%)
90
Contribution of In-term Studies to Overall Grade(%)
90
Contribution of Final Examination to Overall Grade(%)
10
Total(%)
100
LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION
Turkish
WORK PLACEMENT(S)
No
KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES (KLO) / MATRIX OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO)